Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:35:36 -0400
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Mark a reloption as indexterm
Message-ID: <20190415153536.GA10348@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAHGQGwFPgV0P3wPaLeGxdxy_ijn=U1whkSGi5cNLusPK3404xA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Precedence: bulk

On 2019-Apr-16, Fujii Masao wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 1:30 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 2019-Apr-12, Fujii Masao wrote:
> >
> >
> > > OTOH, originally I thought that the following style is smarter.
> > >
> > >     xxx
> > >         configuration parameter, XXX
> > >         storage parameter, Storage Parameter
> >
> > Ah.  Well, I like this style.  Let's do that.
> 
> So I used <secondary> tag again for the above style if both reloption
> and guc with the same parameter name exist. Attached is the updated
> version of the patch. This patch also marks index-reloption as indexterm.

I checked the HTML output.  For autovacuum it says "configuration
parameters" rather than "configuration parameter".  Other than that, it
looks good to me.  (I didn't check that all storage options were covered.)

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services