Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hHJOm-0007TB-6f for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 02:37:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hHJOh-000641-HM for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 02:37:03 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hHJOh-00063u-34 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 02:37:03 +0000 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hHJOd-0007D5-T3 for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 02:37:00 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1852B213BD; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 22:36:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 18 Apr 2019 22:36:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm1; bh=J+tMBJDMw/JQ/40/hwJgC+FuH4O SrjxE6Q8ZlNKMeY8=; b=Kn/Z+5zLOj8NHArJ1O6MfoOCkpF0YcYw4J+SgFH5tuL Nt5n1L3gWVxtoBJnbPmpTljxJVA/oozqFPHQ9OHBS6XaixJCqosvewnyCOzP1OXJ I5YLhx+6OWqHjTDXTByFfUgpLvh9I0Zr60uW3kqAkviRjBCqvcq1BgRPQNoBMkI9 wCYiKur8r6HSKYnRYvCf4fIg0ao6yrwlde72Ioz0LzMKUI6BOK7jzFDzZobHOII+ C6Cb67MoCNiD3LjytxtxfyggNyftIsjSlnh+0vS2qhF55KfJQ3jTXxHylZfQF1iA yew9Pdmdbw6/otxHyuYAEK9EJfFixmaRVigF9NyueQg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=J+tMBJ DMw/JQ/40/hwJgC+FuH4OSrjxE6Q8ZlNKMeY8=; b=UDIjo+iLjo/13YPzGjuMvC PyBQKSGSxp57qeH6q4WqfKsiJJNBLjb9TFxy0Z9aT7rMQwNZTOsSRGTBMluUeLuw 6t7foLnVl5eBjrGfCR/gbRqMVQNHaoG4IgwYPgY0kqKL2qQkBvZSd3l9I85QW0qT koMpomAKCPALBzTTWZL9GQ6Mj0flgZZGshaRSbYqo0jq15DgRl9+8FiM7y+I6rCU aI0JS2tpLRR3mdr2764RZdldoZa5KuLLdbQAZojfqmb6l5NnfuATaMojXbXCePQe m53uC6XAtDJK0gkiu4J/xw5divDCe9746o3NHT2GXcl4xIsBh9M4djo/Lg+j/HVw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrfeeigdehudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfg hrlhcuvffnffculdejtddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddv necuhfhrohhmpefoihgthhgrvghlucfrrghquhhivghruceomhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqh huihgvrhdrgiihiieqnecukfhppeduuddurddutddvrddukedtrddukeehnecurfgrrhgr mhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmihgthhgrvghlsehprghquhhivghrrdighiiinecuvehluh hsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (ee0822lan1.rev.em-net.ne.jp [111.102.180.185]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 47DB3E474A; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 22:36:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:36:54 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Fujii Masao Cc: pgsql-docs Subject: Re: Minor correction in the doc for non-exclusive pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup Message-ID: <20190419023654.GH2660@paquier.xyz> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K1n7F7fSdjvFAEnM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --K1n7F7fSdjvFAEnM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:38:23AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > Regarding backup control functions, the func.sgml describes as above. > But non-exclusive pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup can also be > executed during recovery, and which should be described in the doc. > So I think that the attached patch should be pushed. Thought? >=20 > Probably the patch needs to be back-patched to 9.6 where non-exclusive > backup API was added. +1. -- Michael --K1n7F7fSdjvFAEnM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAly5NEYACgkQnvQgOdby QH09LQ//SBlz0Idti0kBGeqqSiNXahaGsc9xaFToY6O2Z8OglEurouMudCMuzeab 7btSNSdVRIxYLtv2my8+mTj0tCRHjNdF0LBZJsJ95aVpCo4zTv3VMP6gIUl5ZKvB 0zGtdn4s0vSY4xKk8kU4UoUtwUygn6fZLuN1Vk9w2otWKKe7RFpohSZag3OZi3LU VC8LKr3Cf5wiMP0rlGaaz9fP/ETGr8LC9SYcw7X9iClYC8kcsYiGcldbzii+bcBS O0DT/qLEpfPLnpwsSEwpbJFARMAhzGPlakUoBuq+0pBszlhmbfMqYK/3crt6tsjT NpxjX7t4iHfW71R598c9Eki1OZctaQyfHFjHY39mTgy+scXabP1n1wq7fOKO/wec hhBtQHHVtcqyP3DwGLqP5fiZFILaXM+kFFOxWb91SEVuMQ1jrPaolDfWtefoHfdu VXInGEC+edbWrqayhhtOJmGnM/q0+vzTifSABd6uERstd6fMDND4dbfpYth1oaYO 37RljTVmuVckQp9pj63/f2OJusvjLcR1UjLbhxCLFk8/N/q1Ez2FQWUkdYHlVG68 Qn1OL7qQfgOZYwmVGXcSrRyqcJ1xY+/wqvbCW4qhp9TVJDuqrDd8lqZFmvIYiDR7 O62c2qVD/341BhErH6TQ9X15XSYZaXmrbSkN+UZCO/M5zWobTec= =H5ZQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --K1n7F7fSdjvFAEnM--