Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hU9Nx-0003iI-J9 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 24 May 2019 12:33:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hU9Nw-0000ZZ-8A for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 24 May 2019 12:33:20 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hU9Nv-0000ZS-V3 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 24 May 2019 12:33:19 +0000 Received: from tamriel.snowman.net ([2001:470:e38f::11]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hU9Nt-0000B3-U5; Fri, 24 May 2019 12:33:19 +0000 Received: by tamriel.snowman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5DCAA5F79F; Fri, 24 May 2019 08:33:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 08:33:17 -0400 From: Stephen Frost To: Magnus Hagander Cc: Joe Conway , Tom Lane , "Jonathan S. Katz" , Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-hackers , Noah Misch Subject: Re: initdb recommendations Message-ID: <20190524123317.GW2480@tamriel.snowman.net> References: <96389374-9454-d26d-6f79-7c7b15ec14bd@2ndquadrant.com> <81b36e8b-e27b-ab5d-c4f0-6493771bc0ee@postgresql.org> <9f46f065-ca80-f637-8c5d-a9877bcd5eab@postgresql.org> <10093.1558664907@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20190524023009.GL2480@tamriel.snowman.net> <20190524121306.GS2480@tamriel.snowman.net> <17041a05-0e28-f2b1-bf0c-fe375af66b45@joeconway.com> <20190524121904.GU2480@tamriel.snowman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="36+Jv5wzUORg1Ut4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --36+Jv5wzUORg1Ut4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Greetings, * Magnus Hagander (magnus@hagander.net) wrote: > The thing that will potentially hit *end users* is when the RPMs, DEBs or > Windows Installers switch to SCRAM (because of clients with older drivers). Agreed. I'm not sure that our change to SCRAM as default would actually make them change... It might, but I'm not sure and it's really a bit of a different discussion in any case because we need to provide info about how to go about making the migration. > Making the default change away from trust in the source distro will affect > few people. Agreed. > Making the default change of password_encryption -> scram will affect a > *lot* of people. That one needs to be more carefully coordinated. We need to provide better documentation about how to get from md5 to SCRAM, in my view. I'm not sure where that should live, exactly. I really wish we had put more effort into making the migration easy to do over a period of time, and we might actually have to do that before the packagers would be willing to make that change. Thanks, Stephen --36+Jv5wzUORg1Ut4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJc5+SNAAoJEO1sijiDR2RVbQYQALIVzI205RG9aaht5UKxZVi3 XyIqtsmV4bU3cOYxUtL52isQRIPwAisRu/zamWGSwg/aksLqeErRQ+LJ4Po3yg1l bIjmnleu2cLR0+yxZZVFTpqDq/j0KPeR0OLBiCk+kqKA9c7FoqmtgZ/U0M6CDHNr yxUqAp2emylIkzldEUJAB4tz0ahv/NO/FDyKv2+EVkbEGro/AjoGZkI3IKu3gdNH 4d+fWD0XIW8DGnXlgOBgGXFgNdbBYsy/uTygLb1aMnqmX8lySPsKs4LKH3zJoT97 /ZKKV6UAu9Q04weOba80l7NC532J9vlr1QeZzdWwwvinGFFk0CFIMhJFBWqh74IA rJ48zt9ooX94TeN5jUFFDyFFeS5NmlI67LEdMGxuoEwDYJJfGhKNkpBLeRlk8tRz 8mqnh/0HZh9PWVpkwWcY16TK9Fd94OqIeC2MCM6HkpvhwB5X0vR5TY/R2JhLqJ9T VEDzckEWgR/R833X+DGQJIJGrFZDHky51jSAnLS+P2mR7tlbwCrkoA5TWJv+gteV 7kL7C1GX9W5xmPLYw7nh7uBAYKvWZehANrRNermca08O7XnLjEZbwAOPud1HW1u3 eh8iA1y0YkAJDNJr9EGPytnE3slDZ3+Wu5qNxAKyuqfYhCTJXDOht70sF2U26jh8 bnAe6FZyEc5zvqm4DRaR =R8Ax -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --36+Jv5wzUORg1Ut4--