Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDtB7-0000Ku-Ut for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:33:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDtB5-0003r2-7q for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:33:07 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDtB4-0003qv-8l for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:33:06 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iDtB1-00081g-4g for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:33:04 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iDtAz-00061M-MP; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:33:01 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:33:01 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Andres Freund Cc: Tom Lane , Alvaro Herrera , pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Release notes on "reserved OIDs" Message-ID: <20190927163301.GD31412@momjian.us> References: <20190830153424.GA3324@alvherre.pgsql> <29753.1567182909@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20190831024453.GB25522@momjian.us> <20190904094315.ii2nyoxaum2vhvuw@alap3.anarazel.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190904094315.ii2nyoxaum2vhvuw@alap3.anarazel.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 02:43:15AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2019-08-30 22:44:53 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:35:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Alvaro Herrera writes: > > > > Hmm. I wonder if this item really belongs in the release notes at all. > > > > My view is that this was interim policy, not necessarily a permanent > > > > thing; and it's oriented strictly towards PG developers rather than end > > > > users or even fork-developers. > > > > > > I think it's the sort of thing that we sometimes cover in the > > > "source code" changes of the release notes. But yeah, 09568ec3d's > > > idea was pretty much fully superseded by a6417078c, so if we're > > > going to document anything it should be the latter not the former. > > > > OK, sure. I was just basing the release notes on this commit text: > > > > Add a note suggesting that oids in forks should be assigned in the > > 9000-9999 range. > > But how do you get from forks in that sentence from the commit message > (or the source, which says " with 9000-9999 tentatively reserved for > forks"), to the range being for "external extensions"? Those are very > different things imo? I conflated forks and extensions in my head because they both are external efforts that integrate with Postgres. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +