Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEJN6-0007du-U9 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 20:31:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEJN4-00010f-4T for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 20:31:14 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEJN3-0000zp-Q8 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 20:31:13 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iEJN1-00064j-PC for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 20:31:12 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iEJMz-0006XK-Ah; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 16:31:09 -0400 Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 16:31:09 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Magnus Hagander Cc: Tom Lane , Peter Eisentraut , Alexander Law , "pgsql-docs@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Fix contributor name-related inconsistencies in release-12.sgml Message-ID: <20190928203109.GB1377@momjian.us> References: <8984.1569365538@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 08:13:16AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > I would say use the one in the signature in those cases. My guess would be that > that part is under control of the individual, but the from field is in control > of the HR department or whomever controls the name order in the catalogs of > their big company. > > It's fairly common here, for example, to have "lastname, first" in the from, > but nobody would use that in a scenario like this. The reason typically being > wanting "phone book sorting" in the company wide address book, which does sort > on lastname. As an employee people can typically control the name order in > their signature, but not the address book.  > > The situation in Asia may of course be very different, as it often is, but I > think the general rule of who controls the order where still applies.  Uh, we are going to need for committers to handle this issue since it is unlikely we can research email signatures when writing the release notes. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +