Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 18:06:42 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: juha-pekka.eloranta@reaktor.fi, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Synchronous Multimaster Replication
Message-ID: <20191007220642.GB8554@momjian.us>
References: <156856543824.1274.12180817186798859836@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
 <20190928134740.GB26853@momjian.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190928134740.GB26853@momjian.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 09:47:40AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 04:37:18PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> > 
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/different-replication-solutions.html
> > Description:
> > 
> > Not sure if this is an error but I was wondering about this sentence: "In
> > fact, write performance is often worse than that of a single server". Isn't
> > syncronous multimaster write performance always (rather than "often") worse
> > than that of a single (non-distributed) server?
> 
> Very good point. I have improved the text with the attached patch.  I
> also clarified the asynchronous case.

Patch applied thorough all current versions of the Postgres docs. 
Thanks for the report.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +