Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iSAX6-0000LH-Os for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 01:54:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iSAX4-0005ns-E6 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 01:54:50 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iSAX4-0005nc-2J for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 01:54:50 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iSAX1-0000Hm-KQ for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 01:54:48 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iSAX0-00051O-QP; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 20:54:46 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:54:46 -0500 From: Bruce Momjian To: matthew.alton@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Correction For PostgreSQL Manual Message-ID: <20191106015446.GA16353@momjian.us> References: <157204060717.1042.8194076510523669244@wrigleys.postgresql.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gKMricLos+KVdGMg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <157204060717.1042.8194076510523669244@wrigleys.postgresql.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:56:47PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/bgworker.html > Description: > > The warning about background worker processes at the beginning of Chapter 47 > reads: > > Administrators wishing to enable modules that include background worker > process ... > > Should be: > > Administrators wishing to enable modules that include background worker > processes ... > > Hope this helps! Yes, it does help. I have fixed it in all supported versions, patch attached. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="bgwriter.diff" diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml index bc5a52584b..ad17b42c89 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ There are considerable robustness and security risks in using background worker processes because, being written in the C language, they have unrestricted access to data. Administrators wishing to enable - modules that include background worker process should exercise extreme + modules that include background worker processes should exercise extreme caution. Only carefully audited modules should be permitted to run background worker processes. --gKMricLos+KVdGMg--