Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ikvN8-0005oM-Nm for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 19:34:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ikvN6-0006jL-Du for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 19:34:04 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ikvN6-0006hy-2d for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 19:34:04 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ikvN3-0005Q3-UY for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 19:34:02 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ikvN1-0002TE-3u; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 14:33:59 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 14:33:59 -0500 From: Bruce Momjian To: Eugen Konkov Cc: Tom Lane , pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'? Message-ID: <20191227193359.GA16605@momjian.us> References: <155655432452.1371.6115195379691603427@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <5f6b986b-de4d-8a43-1366-fc8c3aed6319@postgresql.org> <1265663903.20190429212216@yandex.ru> <7991.1556573455@sss.pgh.pa.us> <376945611.20191026161529@yandex.ru> <20191106042111.GC16353@momjian.us> <1254054284.20191106121517@yandex.ru> <20191106133328.GA1843@momjian.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191106133328.GA1843@momjian.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 08:33:28AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 12:15:17PM +0200, Eugen Konkov wrote: > > ! Specifying a missing bound as exclusive is automatically converted > > ! to inclusive, e.g., [,] is automatically converted > > ! to (,) > > > > Misspell? > > > > You say: > > exclusive is automatically converted to inclusive > > But then: > > [,] is automatically converted to (,) > > > > which one is correct? > > My mistake. Thanks for finding that. Updated patch attached, plus I > improved the second paragraph. Patch applied back through 9.4. Thank you for the feedback. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +