Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 13:13:31 -0500
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Cc: rirans@comcast.net, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Documentation:  21.5. Default Roles
Message-ID: <20200114181331.GB10430@momjian.us>
References: <157742545062.1149.11052653770497832538@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
 <20191227171654.GA2992@momjian.us>
 <8c2f4f1b90c993c8c6338b978a78a9ebbcd1c934.camel@cybertec.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8c2f4f1b90c993c8c6338b978a78a9ebbcd1c934.camel@cybertec.at>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jan  7, 2020 at 11:46:31AM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-12-27 at 12:16 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 05:44:10AM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> > > 
> > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/default-roles.html
> > > Description:
> > > 
> > > The title is wrong.   The roles are not defaults; they are predefined and
> > > privileged.  The title suggests that a user should expect  to be assigned
> > > these roles.   "21.5 Sub-Administrator Roles"  would be accurate--improving
> > > clarity over all  and removing any need to explain why postgres is not in
> > > this list of roles.
> > > 
> > 
> > Good points.  I have developed the attached documentation patch which
> > includes your ideas.
> 
> +1
> 
> I think that "predefined role" is better than "default role".

Thanks, patch applied through 9.6.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +