Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:12:00 -0500
From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen?= Purtz <juergen@purtz.de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
	Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>,
	Roger Harkavy <rogerharkavy@gmail.com>,
	pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>,
	Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Subject: Re: Add A Glossary
Message-ID: <20200327201200.GV20103@telsasoft.com>
References: 
 <CADkLM=fwtE-TCU7sRnvaE74z12kOp_A+CdUwMr7aZt39pXbh6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200320001122.GA19602@alvherre.pgsql>
 <20200320195841.GA13662@telsasoft.com>
 <64b49f34-eaf6-6de2-e951-0eb8d4afabc2@purtz.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <64b49f34-eaf6-6de2-e951-0eb8d4afabc2@purtz.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 11:32:25PM +0100, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> > > +    <glossterm>Archiver</glossterm>
> > Can you change that to archiver process ?
> 
> I prefer the short term without the addition of 'process' - concerning
> 'Archiver' as well as the other cases. But I'm not an native English
> speaker.

I didn't like it due to lack of context.

What about "wal archiver" ?

It occured to me when I read this.
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200327.163007.128069746774242774.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com

-- 
Justin