Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jam6u-0001sQ-RV for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 20:11:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jam6s-00007U-Q3 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 20:11:38 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jam6s-00007M-Ew for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 20:11:38 +0000 Received: from mail-qv1-xf41.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f41]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jam6n-0006pJ-Dp for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 20:11:37 +0000 Received: by mail-qv1-xf41.google.com with SMTP id ee19so5365936qvb.11 for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 13:11:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=2ndquadrant-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=rjoCfWWwP92upxe1msLQ+zi+VESk/Vv6GRxiceiE94k=; b=pC0nj/btHU478Ax4j4kBM+0RjDAWNa6zB0bnSHXzo0PNVJN95G2HZGDO2Kak0x6zLf wcI4kWPDXU873/nwVwALkZkE3sFZj1xbD8dKzzrNOcRmTqzNcoEOn4EjlST7Bo4C8HhZ crfhNmJCc2nMiAHrTex0yFQ/jV/15pqwxO6Cp+OfCfW1jLvJ+WcTpoupFynK/CfdUUv1 FrzrLFnSpRaD1IP5CZDBhmfcootdwu3Wic+6tbZyhi9Wvxp6XcTuRRxGGgcXeCB63WxB 3LjEQT/9PSnK+BJbI4EjdlkZqXi9NyKT3S49ac+0mIH47Nzn8liFMCTqzYOLiuvrKifA TeHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=rjoCfWWwP92upxe1msLQ+zi+VESk/Vv6GRxiceiE94k=; b=NOCPTj1hxmiHj/zRsoCyhWK98zcM3e1momovP+PDc4f4Z5oCfnAk5Eqy2iUpMlbN6/ kog0zg6UUokYTQ5239Y5t41VlmaubqUWycrI5LkPhMGPWYX/D4iw6flDfoix1woYn2x2 wqV8oxomriCzXIBMfyIMseXGWdv354Na6iV/i2l7+j6RpnEAWDlFfsRsMPv753c8Pzcp 6njKtjzm4hazH3BZU+HgnXdUKBYWcD8StG2zqNvTQHAKfuEE5m1ZhegimaB8n0E8N/iT 5TdNqHvO1gS1Bu0jgoIGJu9w7bfHaYojazBXeRqeL9jSoRUI9/8mjkBbVdgFgajqmNTG KQ3g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530RDxLcnDXgdOiCHro4uIFaCW/kOWn9ZIeb4aTMiIajCDhX2mRW b0GHxKqK4OH83k1fFxPzCjFvnxpUppmVtg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzOIVuutRin1v5kGS/tvKXk6IO22BYfD3a8cNDgdihwMprn1vciU1luNk0oe6S5WopxJ808A== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:a284:: with SMTP id g4mr2605842qva.243.1589832692022; Mon, 18 May 2020 13:11:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nimloth.alvh.no-ip.org ([190.95.18.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l184sm8967901qkf.84.2020.05.18.13.11.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 18 May 2020 13:11:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nimloth.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4286D30076A; Mon, 18 May 2020 16:11:29 -0400 (-04) Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 16:11:29 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: "Jonathan S. Katz" Cc: Tom Lane , Fabien COELHO , pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, PostgreSQL Developers Subject: Re: Another modest proposal for docs formatting: catalog descriptions Message-ID: <20200518201129.GA11307@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200506213810.GA29168@alvherre.pgsql> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 2020-May-06, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > ... oh, okay. I guess I was reporting that the font on the new version > seems to have got smaller. Looking at other pages, it appears that the > font is indeed a lot smaller in all tables, including those Tom has been > editing. So maybe this is desirable for some reason. I'll have to keep > my magnifying glass handy, I suppose. I happened to notice that the font used in the tables get smaller if you make the browser window narrower. So what was happening is that I was using a window that didn't cover the entire screen. If I let the window use my whole screen, the font in the table is the same size than the text outside the table; if I reduce to ~1239 pixels, the font becomes somewhat smaller; if I further reduce to ~953 pixels, it gets really small. Meanwhile, the non-table text keeps the same size the whole time. (The pixel sizes at which changes occur seem to vary with the zoom percentage I use, but the behavior is always there.) Is this something that CSS does somehow? Is this something you expected? Happens with both Brave (a Chromium derivate) and Firefox. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services