Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k9HL8-0005z6-Vj for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 00:24:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k9HL7-0007vP-U2 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 00:24:57 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k9HL7-0007vH-OC for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 00:24:57 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k9HL5-0000mT-8I for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 00:24:57 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k9HL2-0001Ka-Ub; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 20:24:52 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 20:24:52 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: "David G. Johnston" Cc: Tom Lane , Ganesh A Hegde , Magnus Hagander , Pg Docs Subject: Re: typo in sentence Message-ID: <20200822002452.GM13363@momjian.us> References: <159557805290.620.5799935291704169810@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <2462511.1596576273@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 06:03:26PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Tuesday, August 4, 2020, Tom Lane wrote: > > Ganesh A Hegde writes: > > There is only a single sentence starting with 'if' and not two. The > phrase > > 'it is therefore ..' is preceded by a comma and not a period. Hence, > > there's a single sentence and not two as you are referring to. > > I concur with Magnus that the "therefore" refers to the sentences > preceding this one.  While we could just drop it as you suggest, > maybe better is to rearrange: > >     Therefore, if one PostgreSQL server instance is to house projects or >     users that should be separate and for the most part unaware of each >     other, it is recommended to put them into separate databases. > > >   > I put forth a minor reworking of this page a little while back. > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/29/2647/ > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ > CAKFQuwacZW-gNLyScFKFxCg_g7QtT7_HQMOyexuV2zUj=eQFAw@mail.gmail.com Great. I made a few slight adjustments and applied it back through 9.5. -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee