Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:01:00 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
	osdba <mailtch@163.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
Message-ID: <20200824160100.GN26781@momjian.us>
References: <20200824142217.GH26781@momjian.us>
 <20200824155922.GA32094@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200824155922.GA32094@alvherre.pgsql>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:59:22AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-Aug-24, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > I don't think it is worth it, plus we would need to adjust the docs if
> > system catalog layout changes.  I think we just want something concise
> > and simple, but also accurate.
> 
> I argued for \dAo, not straight catalog output -- that was a straw man.
> 
> I can't produce the docbook right now but I volunteer to show a
> screenshot for what I propose later this week.

Sure, I can wait.  Is this the only place where it would make sense?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee