Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:06:25 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	osdba <mailtch@163.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
Message-ID: <20200825140625.GF32540@momjian.us>
References: <20200824142217.GH26781@momjian.us>
 <20200824155922.GA32094@alvherre.pgsql>
 <20200824160100.GN26781@momjian.us>
 <20200825044403.GC2017@paquier.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200825044403.GC2017@paquier.xyz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 01:44:03PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 12:01:00PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Sure, I can wait.  Is this the only place where it would make sense?
> 
> I think so.  If there are other places, it does not prevent improving
> what we already know needs improvement.

Well, my point is that if this area looks different from other places,
it could look odd, so we can't always make incremental fixes to the
docs, though it might be fine in this case.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee