Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kCm6h-00037V-DK for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:52:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kCm6f-0003M7-Qe for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:52:29 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kCm6f-0003M0-Ks for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:52:29 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kCm6d-0002Li-4B for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:52:29 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kCm6a-0007Tf-C2; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:52:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:52:24 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Daniel Gustafsson Cc: Pg Docs Subject: Re: Installation on Cygwin Message-ID: <20200831155224.GC13613@momjian.us> References: <36B39703-734E-480A-82D1-F66A481F8694@yesql.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <36B39703-734E-480A-82D1-F66A481F8694@yesql.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 09:40:59PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > I happened to stumble over the Cygwin section of the installation docs, and was > surprised to see references to not entirely bleeding-edge Windows versions: > > "The adduser command is not supported; use the appropriate user management > application on Windows NT, 2000, or XP. Otherwise, skip this step." > > Not knowing the first thing about Cygwin I might be out cycling here; it does > sound like it's about due for an update to reflect current versions of Windows, > or is this just relevant for older versions? Skimming backwards we have, with > various wordings, recommendeed against Cygwin since 8.0, the current wording > going back to 8.4 more or less unchanged. I am thinking the list of operating systems should just be removed. -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee