Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:23:33 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>,
	PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: "stable storage"
Message-ID: <20200831192333.GK13613@momjian.us>
References: <20200817165222.GA31806@momjian.us>
 <20200821221202.GH13363@momjian.us>
 <CAH2-Wzm3sLSy5yjO=pDO0kDMQ-F9CcPajV+TKGZR9tryWmXNAQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200822034444.GI29590@tamriel.snowman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200822034444.GI29590@tamriel.snowman.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:44:44PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> * Peter Geoghegan (pg@bowt.ie) wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 3:12 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > > > Is "stable storage" the same as "durable storage"?  Should we rename
> > > > "stable storage" mentions to "durable storage"?
> > >
> > > I have developed the attached doc patch to change "stable storage" to
> > > "durable storage".
> > 
> > I agree that this is an improvement. The word "durable" is more
> > descriptive than "stable". (The word "stable" might be more
> > recognizable, but that in itself doesn't make the text any clearer.)
> 
> +1.
> 
> Thanks,

Applied.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee