Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHjYp-0002PM-AB for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 08:10:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHjYo-0003vr-89 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 08:10:02 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHjYo-0003vk-30 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 08:10:02 +0000 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHjYl-0002OM-Mz for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 08:10:01 +0000 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7535E5C00B4; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 04:09:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 04:09:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm2; bh=RwBUs3cJc3sedeopDwzhNa0W5R7 x1EqlYCjj0mEXqWo=; b=iHNUioLTJxzFQXBg4r/IRIetlKg+v63WgpYyTh1CfpA aLmpi9Hyzg88Cyb1vG4arqDsOwVnjBrTKid0iH54SzkRwqMUYi5fhtOLLRkRNfRR 1LeJ0HiBDbM0a4syqiGbH5hgWkGs6V4K/OGTnOsf4U5MKCrFKZ65rDK6MMwqhByZ wcnQX5UB58nY+mf16XIpxqqj5Btj4RyftE3gkzLGO4QNBLLALaGxO7j+S5yHXqFp PjY9wt6b4qX5KyCaz8ityul9H71girMd2+zQi254Qkt4IHP86Kqvf9uGDDfL8ukH li6N6aTZ4aDGwuJDcor5BaEZoKK1hAPZU8CYR4SE4og== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=RwBUs3 cJc3sedeopDwzhNa0W5R7x1EqlYCjj0mEXqWo=; b=B6GOhxUUJRSIexl+vP9VWC 4o8oUeP2Q2Wklh40NWIctrtFNvP8sDmdjbD6jUlI8Ur1kdAg1hmAIcNa0p5okQC9 zYCdIBecshem/InjKrRFiYVOFXrvl9/F+bLQMqq/RS2ACPWXpQBZUfaONto8FupU fBJrpVWmvLhCkmwJgSamqhYMhwqJZMQ2iQ5rXxIDrNKpazs6t9ENwUHcP8JxuEJH u5GWBykS3afHlgepDiXiBu+F34QBxKa8kP3t7CzMO7nJeTpSbbK9QUC4j0IOtDrZ Am17R/oKIah9ReSaL/qTNswYjV89sxEwOZF5mwym/FFlciGvk8cy015ayDxxBf3g == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudeiiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurf hrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfghrlh cuvffnffculdejtddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddvnecu hfhrohhmpefoihgthhgrvghlucfrrghquhhivghruceomhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqhhuih gvrhdrgiihiieqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvdegudeuhfdtueeltedtveejheehieev ueeigeelteegleejleeiueeiheegvefhnecukfhppeduuddurddutddvrddukedtrdduke ehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhi tghhrggvlhesphgrqhhuihgvrhdrgiihii X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (ee0822lan1.rev.em-net.ne.jp [111.102.180.185]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ED198328006A; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 04:09:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 17:09:54 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Magnus Hagander Cc: Robert Treat , pgsql-docs Subject: Re: replication wordsmithing / clarifications Message-ID: <20200914080954.GF2183@paquier.xyz> References: <20200912014550.GL2743@paquier.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pyE8wggRBhVBcj8z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --pyE8wggRBhVBcj8z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 11:52:11AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > In particular, why is the primary a "server" and the replica a "node"? That > caught my eye for inconsistency -- but changing node to cluster will be > equally inconsistent, just in a different way. Why not just call them both > servers? Makes sense. -- Michael --pyE8wggRBhVBcj8z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAl9fJVIACgkQnvQgOdby QH1CvBAAkgUJoKk/lLrvyOHjBE+eGswAeQl0vwC1MSUY/jtP2VgZ1B5NoynHMxWD SgFSfPM7L6dQaARr494j3MG9+0dQLMIqHypz01UQC+oT+wjonAfin5sxOmH+EUqn hNEsCLUUvRmWEECtp3AvDf7R4OtAFso5rP914VVgKcrCSd7ghot9fyo8YqOowj5M OlPHpkZE+kfy9qHG5jCmOBY5ZlvpfIbODUUhHieAjwXrl+8mqvZQ5tWmBr0OWT4P R6SQqW5md/wJdbmV4+YkLS2pRipAExTmVjy9JlqN/f51Ea5FPmbqbX3nPVEZSE0o yhsyXZbgJyNLRauJp3FMkgKWZeVNZegDXm3lh0sXIRmc9Iim298JtyFusLicm9El 1kKwcIeEAJtnQSyG8m/Y8O6t7yl/2XXlsBY+VTgxaDEbw8GEy4l5lxEYuQ/UaFYV sNm7UEOkzcOtsNrM8CTxDEa2tB+XX6KkSMEOxts+zy8mUI3uQgBr/EgBSHc96Qvo +rJIsdm1Rbib32krY3T9fMsN7ZLZmlzTo3w7nHpeMdyj/qmm30X2tGUdnJYgIJKF NrRMPPXeC4SMiAXzRH0vphhen2YUMhJI8NMF3vHics7fVj6qc9bEVXm+C2HTu9Xr SJZXRXEtl5fvIDrpV94vaIBBfUTjZnJXvuGq9pMOGYZ1MVzv0Kk= =vDkX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pyE8wggRBhVBcj8z--