Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHjZv-0002S8-I4 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 08:11:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHjZt-0004ew-MR for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 08:11:09 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHjZt-0004ep-H7 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 08:11:09 +0000 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHjZr-0002Oy-6m for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 08:11:08 +0000 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2384F5C00E6; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 04:11:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 04:11:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm2; bh=yqg8YX5zBTkMNOspRP09OJgrtol VGEoc0OEC0MSm6TE=; b=mFX3cdjiDnnAt9hrwZvOCCSKLe/D5fj7+HwM5iY21Jg MwoqlMkTuquW2cZB6ed5aV5BH08E1mee12T0/HOsz96An+0ToGeKyQ/MicU3VgxW LFKuCNI1+eVZXaZSfCOvnfJ6of8/+IOhOo1MAQNRSw0tTyj8oeOIK/qBL0MD5MiU +KcVx0rK/KSC+eoRW2On3qBGClxYD107Oq/KIRbEpEU86ck8+hhO1nB042ll63Ih vljxBUSIYIF7QB810FfdmkW/m+7HLNBKxAU2opZpjeUI6Y0sbYNo2HKkUEOR/w6g mxVCRN5nW2mkBuKlvEE3oDo+5SPcV/mRru9EmVG2BZA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=yqg8YX 5zBTkMNOspRP09OJgrtolVGEoc0OEC0MSm6TE=; b=BEDl0R/kdFtwVve6iSZQ2L DSgk6kUPwZFNEmg3nuVX1d0G8ZHxlqOHjsRmjODmZBCuK6CI/lQDNqjyIcXbKnOm 6RR0w4vAAhVBpj5JV929uiyguraX/8D+RfIAA2VjOS48BbCvOYxiqRhnoEMEDwhz qha3AvIE7hzpFXoGQh2HSIZAtsD/KcEXMNCLK4BxInd/1VOVc4+gPZR/Tg2Bna5f 34SbOasESqNkBI3zCKnVpWKHqKMHrIUAUFE6a0Qcsw2wKnCb7ustXmAMhZo7TVCH BvZugPCpgD+0q5Xew8aBE2X083exHNOF189XmuE4gOsJIIVTgrYH9j1TCxO1oV+Q == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudeiiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurf hrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecufghrlhcuvffnffculdejtddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukf hfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefoihgthhgrvghlucfrrghquhhivghr uceomhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqhhuihgvrhdrgiihiieqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvd egudeuhfdtueeltedtveejheehieevueeigeelteegleejleeiueeiheegvefhnecukfhp peduuddurddutddvrddukedtrddukeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepudenucfrrg hrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqhhuihgvrhdrgiihii X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (ee0822lan1.rev.em-net.ne.jp [111.102.180.185]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BAF46306467E; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 04:11:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 17:11:01 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Robert Treat Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: replication wordsmithing / clarifications Message-ID: <20200914081101.GG2183@paquier.xyz> References: <20200912014550.GL2743@paquier.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="p7qwJlK53pWzbayA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --p7qwJlK53pWzbayA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 12:40:45PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote: > maybe "to one or more replicas." or maybe "to one or more replica > targets." I'd avoid the word cluster because you could set it up to > send to multiple databases in the same postgres cluster. Magnus has given a better suggestion: to just use "servers". > If you think about it, this sentence is essentially saying "If you > don't like the downsides of this replication method, you can use an > entirely different replication method." Well sure, you could, but once > you are using a different method, you are no longer using the method > we are trying to describe. In addition, there are several other > systems you could use beyond the suggested one, so suggestion this > specific one felt mis-leading or out of place. And it is not something > we talk about in any of the other sections (after all, every > replication system has trade-offs that might not be acceptable, that's > why we have so many of them). OK, I see your point. Seeing like that, it makes sense. -- Michael --p7qwJlK53pWzbayA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAl9fJZUACgkQnvQgOdby QH3gDg//as4eyg3PtWZgvZvk1bOH979OTW3CEeFgkXWz1LLGjkf7msOf7I8LLyF7 ILuC+S9SNSZztAdhH57ebIhstb7GahdI61SzDzx4zKHRKZD0edLQNYixVCamJM2/ C/264CePhVtZ3Pz/GDDU0Zlo6WU/6qKJRcAnANgayN/wnPZ9BbGLhVVWQDj1v2LA 8cA/ZbUYjTu7GJCuoV1t2a0i31KJlzwTrU862ti0TG5fdIFz2ZSCiXJYCoi2XFpC v3hFbBdEBPjGrjaDSgNvwCcY10w/VNFTIlnI3XIeay2QVTlTwZvXujvDWgo+fbPb 9MeDdXVfMY6PiZjmSUuRTxbwOwIydvaZWOjrDdU+0EKhpYLTFPLWce68xtYpv+4N i7ljwAxm99EmIcXDvfc1zuxTbQC9F07RcYG0oJzZdZodMHEYCMw/RCeq/Whx3UeI 1UTSh2ulbXJ3ImDK3tuvhRlqtB7z6xOq6DT4P/3YbC1L2ehD0g8Py9XbiF3o7PGT duK6OQJY50FAbxLCG1/DfjSt1V2ssRbVIk3FEFf7nT0j91q+aPKjQlhn8tJQtsLj QtCdVO+FQhy5z3/X0X2xmpDeZPkrJD9SECIxCWoHgjIfUi8G9stNtCoaA2bFFop7 FKP9IdHjg7oK1LsXT6CXuYfHaPvwokJ0wu0sk1t7OqmJIB+HIoI= =aKPB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --p7qwJlK53pWzbayA--