Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:32:00 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation
Message-ID: <20201008183200.GF13054@momjian.us>
References: 
 <ZR0P278MB0122119FAE78721A694C30C8D2340@ZR0P278MB0122.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <GVAP278MB01028F3C84C0A724412854EDD20B0@GVAP278MB0102.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <20201008162310.GA13054@momjian.us>
 <GVAP278MB010226D15C90933B3C2D198BD20B0@GVAP278MB0102.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <GVAP278MB010226D15C90933B3C2D198BD20B0@GVAP278MB0102.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Oct  8, 2020 at 06:12:47PM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>  
> >On Thu, Oct  8, 2020 at 06:34:32AM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> as this does not get any attention on the docs-list, once again here.
> >> Any thoughts on this?
> 
> >I was hoping someone more experienced with this would comment, but
> >seeing none, I will apply it in a day or two to all supported versions?
> >Have you tested this output back to 9.5?
> 
> I hoped that as well. No, I tested down to 9.6 because the change happened in
> 10.

OK, so the patch should be applied only to PG 10 and later?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee