Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:53:52 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation
Message-ID: <20201008195352.GA5062@momjian.us>
References: 
 <ZR0P278MB0122119FAE78721A694C30C8D2340@ZR0P278MB0122.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <GVAP278MB01028F3C84C0A724412854EDD20B0@GVAP278MB0102.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <20201008162310.GA13054@momjian.us>
 <GVAP278MB010226D15C90933B3C2D198BD20B0@GVAP278MB0102.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <2622731.1602186212@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2622731.1602186212@sss.pgh.pa.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Oct  8, 2020 at 03:43:32PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com> writes:
> >> I was hoping someone more experienced with this would comment, but
> >> seeing none, I will apply it in a day or two to all supported versions?
> >> Have you tested this output back to 9.5?
> 
> > I hoped that as well. No, I tested down to 9.6 because the change happened in 10.
> 
> The patch assumes that parallel query is enabled, which is not true by
> default before v10, so it should certainly not be applied before v10
> (at least not without significant revisions).

I think we should just go for simple application cases for this.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee