Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kXSfc-0005xq-QI for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:22:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kXSfa-0005Yb-QI for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:22:02 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kXSfa-0005YU-LJ for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:22:02 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kXSfY-0008EG-8A for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:22:02 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kXSfV-0004Pq-87; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:21:57 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:21:57 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Tom Lane Cc: e.indrupskaya@postgrespro.ru, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Missing directory is mentioned on page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/libpq-exec.html. Message-ID: <20201027172157.GP4951@momjian.us> References: <160379609706.24746.7506163279454026608@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <20201027164724.GN4951@momjian.us> <1060663.1603817676@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1060663.1603817676@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 12:54:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > I have applied the attached patch to all branches to remove the > > paragraph. > > The removal only happened in HEAD, so I'm unclear on why you back-patched > this doc change? Uh, at the top of all my branches, I typed: ls */src/tools/thread and saw no hits in _any_ of the branches. I now see that the problem wasn't that /src/_tools_/thread was removed but that the docs referenced it instead of src/_test_/thread. However, it doesn't compile because of the pg_printf reference. I am thinking removing the paragraph in the back branches was the right thing to do all along. Agreed? > But thanks for finding the reference; I'd only searched for test/thread, > not tools/thread. Looks like src/template/netbsd has an old reference > too. Remove that too? -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee