Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kkXhL-0001Ey-Oq for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 19:21:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kkXhK-00076g-LE for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 19:21:54 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kkXhK-000758-FY for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 19:21:54 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kkXhH-0004HA-EH for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 19:21:53 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kkXh8-00015T-2Q; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 14:21:42 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:21:42 -0500 From: Bruce Momjian To: Heikki Linnakangas Cc: Daniel Gustafsson , Pg Docs Subject: Re: Consistent reference to RFCs in the documentation Message-ID: <20201202192142.GA20285@momjian.us> References: <2C697878-4D01-4F06-8312-2FEDE931E973@yesql.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 02:39:04PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 05/11/2020 17:09, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > When referencing RFC's, we have a mix of ulinking to the ietf.org entry and > > not. Also, for subsequent mentions of the same RFC on the same page we have > > some as while others are not. > > I'm not sure how sensible the tag is for these. I mean, yeah, it's > an acronym, but it wouldn't make sense to write it open. It doesn't seem to > affect the formatting in the HTML docs, at least I don't see any difference > in my browser. But let's be consistent. Ideally acronyms would use smallcaps, but I don't think we have that configured in our style sheets. -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee