Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:42:27 -0500
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: ramkly@yahoo.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade is not correct
Message-ID: <20201216234227.GI4527@momjian.us>
References: <160739721042.708.4306720394513934628@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <160739721042.708.4306720394513934628@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Dec  8, 2020 at 03:13:30AM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> 
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/pgupgrade.html
> Description:
> 
> If we use the following command to upgrade the standby server, then new
> cluster will create by old_cluster which is not correct.
> rsync --archive --delete --hard-links --size-only --no-inc-recursive
> old_cluster new_cluster remote_dir
> I used following command and this one is correct:
> rsync --archive --delete --hard-links --size-only --no-inc-recursive
> new_cluster old_cluster remote_dir 
> So the only thing need to change is the place of old_cluster and new_cluster
> in rsync command.

I am not sure how to reply.  These instructions have been unchanged for
a few years.  Why is the order you suggest correct?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee