Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lT69N-0001aA-ME for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 17:03:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lT69M-0007bT-IL for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 17:03:00 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lT69L-0007bM-Jn for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 17:03:00 +0000 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lT69I-00016o-NO for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 17:02:59 +0000 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BEF5C0085; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 13:02:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 04 Apr 2021 13:02:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=cFc7pofwTdhISBadFfQNxgeToQhl3pYlJJqrPefxeec=; b=FMjVIzlV /j9s+7DCs9+rV9AgAbE4btG1NxpXfe0iKibSNZlxLLh37dwqM1WWdGOgRMjcG2sN U8jshAfsg24Ke2UJXlOcHY/CxSmg9e2xWvmYKOOMMVemo2L5ugSmxSudcNDBGeab roHwvZbrEG15KBrBaNhmPnmpWKQITD6Pm8HrClrhORABsyZdAAvt1P2R8zIzF4Tr 25VAoyVj1sST8atuJC3vuSrkEO0gpHxEGQmL8FybOaVILcjkXerLO0vqYMkJR/CL M21HSWTXBW25lnwdUStRuQh6vrk04pubKtpdoSs12V7URQPb0ezW7E/WJmn8vOlZ m8jhSUX2CgGnww== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudejtddguddtkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkgggtugfgjggfsehtkeertddtredunecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhv rghrohcujfgvrhhrvghrrgcuoegrlhhvhhgvrhhrvgesrghlvhhhrdhnohdqihhprdhorh hgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeufffhjeeiueeuffegvddukeegledtveeivdeiueef ieeivefgteehueefteehvdenucfkphepudeltddrleehrdduledrleehnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlvhhhvghrrhgvsegr lhhvhhdrnhhoqdhiphdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (unknown [190.95.19.95]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7AB7E240054; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 13:02:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 86BDB2A09C0; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 13:02:48 -0400 (-04) Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2021 13:02:48 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen?= Purtz Cc: David Steele , Heikki Linnakangas , Erik Rijkers , "David G. Johnston" , PostgreSQL Hackers , Justin Pryzby Subject: Re: Additional Chapter for Tutorial - arch-dev.sgml Message-ID: <20210404170248.GA26954@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 2021-Apr-04, Jürgen Purtz wrote: > The small patch 'arch-dev.sgml.20210121.diff' contains only some clearing up > concerning the used terminology and its alignments with the glossary. The > patch was rejected by Heikki. This comment is not helpful, because it's not obvious where would I find that patch. Also, you say "the patch was rejected by Heikki" but upthread he said he committed it. His comment was that he left out some paragraphs because of a style issue. Did you re-post that patch after fixing the style issues? If you did, I couldn't find it. > The latest version of the huge patch '0013-architecture.patch' is valid and > doesn't contain merge conflicts. Yeah, OK, but I have to dive deep in the thread to find it. Please post it again. When you have a patch series, please post it as a whole every time -- that makes it easier for a committer to review it. You seem to be making your life hard by not using git to assist you. Do you know you can have several commits in a branch of your own, rebase it to latest master, merge master to it, rebase on top of master, commit fixups, "rebase -i" and change commit ordering to remove unnecessary fixup commits, and so on? Such techniques are extremely helpful when dealing with a patch series. When you want to post a new version to the list, you can just do "git format-patch -v14 origin/master" to produce a set of patch files. You don't need to manually give names to your patch files, or come up with a versioning scheme. Just increment the argument to -v by +1 each time you (or somebody else) posts a new version of the patch series. -- Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile