Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lz8Qx-0008PT-HA for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 01:57:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lz8Qw-00018A-D4 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 01:57:34 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lz8Qw-000182-79 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 01:57:34 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lz8Qt-0005tW-R4 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 01:57:33 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lz8Qo-0006lL-SY; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 21:57:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 21:57:26 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Stephen Frost Cc: "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" , Euler Taveira , "pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Link missing in the 14 release notes Message-ID: <20210702015726.GG3618@momjian.us> References: <20210701214616.GT20766@tamriel.snowman.net> <20210702013517.GF3618@momjian.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 09:47:47PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 21:35 Bruce Momjian wrote: > I normally link to only the _first_ mention of something, and since they > are both in the same section, I didn't add a link for the second one. > Adding a second link might suggest that there is more information > available, even though the coarseness of our links means that section is > the same. > > Perhaps the wording would be better as something like: > > New predefined roles for granting access to read/write all > tables have been added, called pg_read_all_data and pg_write_all_data ..? > > Or something along those lines? I have avoided doing that since the link is about the roles, not about the term "predefined roles". > Just a thought. > > Perhaps another idea would be to make one link which includes both names. Uh, that is going to look odd, I am afraid. -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.