Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m5UBg-0005z7-Ig for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:24:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m5UBf-00065E-Em for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:24:03 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m5UBf-00064x-8b for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:24:03 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m5UBa-0002Qa-Jo for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:24:02 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m5UBX-0007w5-Mi; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:23:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:23:55 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Tom Lane Cc: troy@frericks.us, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Manua correction Message-ID: <20210719142355.GA12687@momjian.us> References: <162614304115.701.2392941350859387646@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <20210715213623.GC14027@momjian.us> <3701102.1626405158@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3701102.1626405158@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 11:12:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > Interesting. I see several cases where our docs are not clear we > > process only the first match: > > At least two of these changes are flat out wrong. The places > that explicitly mention "substring(s)" are not doing so because > we failed to think about what that meant. I really don't understand the use of "(s)" except in place where we are really trying to point out the idea of one or multiple, and I don't see that being significant in these cases --- can you clarify? -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.