Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mAij4-00076p-77 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 00:56:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mAij3-0004AN-3m for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 00:56:09 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mAij2-0004AF-U3 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 00:56:08 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mAij0-0005HO-BQ for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 00:56:08 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mAiiw-0005g0-9p; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 20:56:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 20:56:02 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: "David G. Johnston" Cc: mali_86@outlook.com, Pg Docs Subject: Re: psql's commit df9f599b is not documented Message-ID: <20210803005602.GB3639@momjian.us> References: <162794046650.25749.16629649309696437240@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <20210802230959.GA7858@momjian.us> <20210803000350.GA3639@momjian.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 05:24:14PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 5:03 PM Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I think we put it in the PG 11 release notes so people who used Postgres > previously would know this item is improved, but for new folks, it will > just work if they try it, but we don't want to encourage them to try it. > > > > And why do we care about informing people those people of this undocumented > behavior? It's not like we want to encourage them to use it either. > > I stand by my conviction that a release note entry for a user-visible feature > requires having documented said feature in the main documentation - and > vice-versa. We had a long discussion about this in the PG 11 time frame and that was what was decided. -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.