Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLWjk-00069n-VP for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 20:21:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLWjj-0000cZ-UV for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 20:21:31 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLWjj-0000aS-OH for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 20:21:31 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLWjd-00010r-Bq for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 20:21:30 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLWjb-00008n-GE; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:21:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 16:21:23 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Michael Minock Cc: "David G. Johnston" , "pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Simple re-wording Message-ID: <20210901202123.GD24833@momjian.us> References: <163048307107.701.2240706744889057086@wrigleys.postgresql.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 03:14:34PM +0200, Michael Minock wrote: > Well the sentence read funny to me. But after reading it again now I see that > what you mean is that the subject should confirm that what they are trying to > do should actually be achievable.   > > Note that I am going through the entire documentation over the next week or so > and will try to eagle eye any corrections if I can. This is the only sentence I > have found problematic so far and now upon reflection I think I can chalk this > up to my own misunderstanding.  Great, thanks for your reviewing this and let us know what else you find. -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.