Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHAk1-0003fE-91 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 17:54:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHAjx-0003x6-Ij for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 17:54:41 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHAjx-0003wx-B8 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 17:54:41 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHAju-0004YS-Oq for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 17:54:40 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x96HsYbG020329; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 13:54:34 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: =?UTF-8?B?5paJ6Jek55m7?= cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Duplicate paragraph in catalogs.sgml In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to =?UTF-8?B?5paJ6Jek55m7?= message dated "Mon, 07 Oct 2019 01:37:57 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <20327.1570384474.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2019 13:54:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20328.1570384474@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk =?UTF-8?B?5paJ6Jek55m7?= writes: > The same paragraph followed in catalogs.sgml. > A patch that removes it. Hmm, the dup para as well as the one after it were inserted by aa087ec64, and they both look out of place there. I think we need to do more than just delete the dup; the other one needs to be moved to the pg_statistic_ext_data section (and then reworded a bit). Will fix, thanks for the report! regards, tom lane