Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rkPjk-00Can8-Jy for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:37:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rkPjj-005S14-5H for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:37:43 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rkPji-005Ryi-To for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:37:43 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rkPjg-004JLy-RJ for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:37:42 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 42DEbdTP2046714; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 10:37:39 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: ignacio.alonso@microsoft.com cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Incomplete sentence in the description for most_common_freqs In-reply-to: <171016070409.643.16434721324414247328@wrigleys.postgresql.org> References: <171016070409.643.16434721324414247328@wrigleys.postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Doc comments form message dated "Mon, 11 Mar 2024 12:38:24 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2046712.1710340659.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 10:37:39 -0400 Message-ID: <2046713.1710340659@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk PG Doc comments form writes: > It seems the ending clarifying sentence: > "(Null when most_common_vals is.)" > should rather be: > "(Null when most_common_vals is null.)" I think it's perfectly good English as-is, if a bit terse. regards, tom lane