X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520855E46C8 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:14:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36921-09 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 17:14:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DD75E46C5 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:14:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i76HEkbT020528; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 13:14:46 -0400 (EDT) To: Josh Berkus Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PostgreSQL.conf / runtime docs In-reply-to: <200408060942.25604.josh@agliodbs.com> References: <200408060942.25604.josh@agliodbs.com> Comments: In-reply-to Josh Berkus message dated "Fri, 06 Aug 2004 09:42:25 -0700" Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 13:14:46 -0400 Message-ID: <20527.1091812486@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200408/12 X-Sequence-Number: 2472 Josh Berkus writes: > As we've always accepted doc patches up until a few days before > release, this shouldn't be a problem, yes? I'd be really surprised if anyone wants to change that policy. regards, tom lane