Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bmRe6-0005Km-9K for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:28:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bmRe5-0000uh-SU for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:28:01 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bmRdj-0000UY-VO for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:27:40 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bmRdh-0007bH-Dv for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:27:39 +0000 Received: from pro.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u8KKRN7r020399; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:27:23 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Eisentraut cc: Heikki Linnakangas , pgsql-docs Subject: Re: Obsolete warning on Python 2.4 In-reply-to: <04f81c77-ee67-5604-4297-ecd8969d3cf3@2ndquadrant.com> References: <85e377b2-d459-396e-59b1-115548bbc059@iki.fi> <04f81c77-ee67-5604-4297-ecd8969d3cf3@2ndquadrant.com> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:31:58 -0400" Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:27:22 -0400 Message-ID: <20976.1474403242@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org Peter Eisentraut writes: > On 9/19/16 1:21 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> That seems uninteresting to anyone in 2016. Any objections to removing it? > We're still maintaining compatibility with Python 2.4 and the bug > apparently still exists, so I would perhaps keep it until we kill > support for Python 2.4. Since the bug doesn't happen in production builds of Python, only in debug builds, I'm not really worried that it's still a factor, even if you believe that the Python folk still haven't patched it. In short, I agree with Heikki that we could remove this. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs