Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cPWHl-000724-Vj for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 15:18:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cPWHl-0001Fr-Io for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 15:18:29 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cPWHj-0001CH-Od; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 15:18:27 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cPWHg-00036K-Ly; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 15:18:27 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v06FILxp021062; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 10:18:21 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Magnus Hagander cc: Tatsuo Ishii , pgsql-docs , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Questionable tag usage In-reply-to: References: <20170105.092557.1822243556008160851.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp> <25963.1483591811@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Magnus Hagander message dated "Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:56:35 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <21060.1483715901.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 10:18:21 -0500 Message-ID: <21061.1483715901@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org Magnus Hagander writes: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Well ... that will read nicely in output formats that have hyperlinks, >> but not so well on plain dead trees where the cross-reference is either >> invisible or an explicit footnote. Our typical convention for this sort >> of thing has been more like "... file for user name mapping (see > linkend="auth-username-maps">)". That used to expand like >> ... >> You could argue that nobody reads the PG docs on dead trees anymore >> and we should embrace the hyperlink style with enthusiasm. I wouldn't >> be against that personally, but there are a lot of places to change if >> we decide that parenthetical "(see Section M.N)" hotlinks are passé. > I don't think there are a lto of people who use dead tree editions anymore, > but they certainly do exist. A lot of people use the PDFs though, > particularly for offline reading or loading them in ebook readers. So it > still has to be workable there. PDFs do have hyperlinks, so that in itself isn't an argument for keeping the dead-tree-friendly approach. However, I've noticed some variation among tools in whether a PDF hyperlink is visibly distinct, or whether you have to mouse over it to find out that it would take you somewhere. Not sure if that's enough of a usability fail to argue for keeping the old way. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs