Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218342E0044
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@developer.postgresql.org>;
	Sat,  7 Jun 2008 14:03:02 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 02565-07
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@developer.postgresql.org>;
	Sat,  7 Jun 2008 14:02:58 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD302E003F
	for <pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org>; Sat,  7 Jun 2008 14:02:58 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m57H2v2q021336
	for <pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org>; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 13:02:58 -0400 (EDT)
To: pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org
Subject: "Release date" for aborted releases?
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 13:02:57 -0400
Message-ID: <21335.1212858177@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200806/1
X-Sequence-Number: 4918

I am wondering whether to leave the release note pages for 8.3.2, 8.2.8,
etc saying "Release date: 2008-06-09", or to change them to something
like "Never released".  Thoughts?

			regards, tom lane