Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k9V6h-0000Jk-UI for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 15:06:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k9V6g-0001x1-Sc for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 15:06:58 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k9V6g-0001wu-MK for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 15:06:58 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k9V6e-0001oD-IK for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 15:06:57 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07MF6qmq2146374; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 11:06:52 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Paquier cc: Alexander Lakhin , "pgsql-docs@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Minor fixes for PostgreSQL 13 documentation In-reply-to: <20200822133022.GC24782@paquier.xyz> References: <20200822133022.GC24782@paquier.xyz> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier message dated "Sat, 22 Aug 2020 22:30:22 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2146372.1598108812.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 11:06:52 -0400 Message-ID: <2146373.1598108812@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Michael Paquier writes: > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 01:10:11PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote: >> - The function is passed a pointer to a local_relopts<= /replaceable> >> + The function is passed a pointer to a local_relopts > The docs of brin, gin, gist and spgist disagree with that. Wouldn't > it be better to update all of them? Yeah, probably. See 47046763c for some policy I'd made up about when to use --- typedef names definitely don't fit. regards, tom lane