Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ihx2I-0003eO-F6 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:44:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ihx2H-0007on-87 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:44:17 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ihx2G-0007ob-Rf; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:44:16 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ihx2E-0003m5-MP; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:44:15 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xBJEi7qO021641; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:44:08 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Magnus Hagander cc: Stephen Frost , Dave Cramer , Peter Eisentraut , PostgreSQL-development , pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: client auth docs seem to have devolved In-reply-to: <10979.1576692438@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <13336.1576598463@sss.pgh.pa.us> <10979.1576692438@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:07:18 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <21639.1576766647.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:44:07 -0500 Message-ID: <21640.1576766647@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk I wrote: > Concretely, I propose the attached. Anybody want to editorialize on > my short descriptions of the auth methods? Pushed after a bit more fiddling with the wording. regards, tom lane