Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h2fAL-0002Mm-JN for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 16:49:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h2fAJ-0001Jf-VQ for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 16:49:39 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h2fAJ-0001JY-MA for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 16:49:39 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h2fAD-0005vZ-6B for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 16:49:38 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x29GnVmc021706; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 11:49:31 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Bruce Momjian cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen?= Purtz , pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: First SVG graphic In-reply-to: <20190309155411.mn5hqlhjbhhrdb4u@momjian.us> References: <6a97acaf-06e8-519c-a4ff-04a13e0d2675@2ndquadrant.com> <5ad6b96d-47d0-eb08-edc4-803645d2fd31@purtz.de> <4393cdcd-4efd-3198-4ffc-c080a5af79c7@2ndquadrant.com> <55a6a8cb-bfaa-e5a6-4596-82f445f1ec7c@2ndquadrant.com> <86af349c-5bcb-a28c-d858-c5cb0a283cd2@purtz.de> <808a932e-bc40-d57e-7de2-5e4fd9a24ac6@purtz.de> <58af275f-a46a-0ec5-8f95-c8ece23ee038@purtz.de> <20190309155411.mn5hqlhjbhhrdb4u@momjian.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Sat, 09 Mar 2019 10:54:11 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <21704.1552150171.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 11:49:31 -0500 Message-ID: <21705.1552150171@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Bruce Momjian writes: > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 02:17:33PM +0300, Jürgen Purtz wrote: >> What is your opinion? Should we renounce the additional manual step and use >> only the pure "Optimized SVG" format? This will increase the >> 'diff-ablility', which may be valuable in the long term. But direct >> readability of the files suffers more or less. > Uh, so really there is plain SVG, "Optimized SVG", and readable SVG. I > am thinking you should store just "Optimized SVG", and provide a shell > script to convert to readable SVG for those that want it. Man, this discussion is leaving me disheartened. It sure sounds like we are going to end up in a situation where either everyone touching the graphics has to use the same version of the same tool (with the same options, even), or else we're going to have massive, unreadable, and mostly content-free diffs in every patch. regards, tom lane