Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nECVa-0000l4-56 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 15:52:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nECVZ-0007C7-2q for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 15:52:53 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nECVY-0007By-Ry for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 15:52:52 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nECVW-0003gN-MU for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 15:52:51 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 20UFqm7l217855; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 10:52:48 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Magnus Hagander cc: supersuper1231@outlook.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: documentation typo In-reply-to: References: <164353261519.713.8748040527537500758@wrigleys.postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to Magnus Hagander message dated "Sun, 30 Jan 2022 13:44:03 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <217853.1643557968.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 10:52:48 -0500 Message-ID: <217854.1643557968@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Magnus Hagander writes: > It might be worth splitting that part into one section with the > current function (lo_create) and then a separate section with the > backwards-compatible lo_creat function though -- I can see how it's > easy to come to the conclusion you did from reading it, and that could > be made a lot more clear. I dunno, the section already makes it perfectly clear that there are two functions. I could get behind documenting the more modern one first, though. I wonder if it's time to remove the references to PG 8.1? regards, tom lane