Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gnPXH-0007Tk-Ay for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 15:06:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gnPXF-0002rV-Vb for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 15:06:17 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gnPXF-0002rO-PW for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 15:06:17 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gnPX9-0007zK-AQ for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 15:06:17 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x0QF66FU021921; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 10:06:06 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: "Jonathan S. Katz" cc: Bruce Momjian , Magnus Hagander , Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal In-reply-to: <8fd2ae88-49de-26f3-def3-e4381cb7e774@postgresql.org> References: <19252.1533509841@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20190125233111.GE13803@momjian.us> <16080.1548459680@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20190125234614.GH13803@momjian.us> <8fd2ae88-49de-26f3-def3-e4381cb7e774@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to "Jonathan S. Katz" message dated "Sat, 26 Jan 2019 08:14:44 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <21919.1548515166.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 10:06:06 -0500 Message-ID: <21920.1548515166@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk "Jonathan S. Katz" writes: > The one "caveat" I will bring up is that once pushed and applied to the > site, we would bring introduce a lot of 404s into the website. Hm. In principle we could probably insert some redirects, but I doubt it's worth the trouble. If I haven't heard objections, I'll see about making this happen during the first week of Feb (after the CF closes, but before it's time to do the February releases' notes). regards, tom lane