From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
cc: him@nathanmlong.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Clarify how triggers relate to transactions
In-reply-to: <740c8d600cac5b816f8351dbc47b7e457260ed48.camel@cybertec.at>
References: <161953360822.695.15805897835151971142@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
 <1a565681fe54535d69e6418ef5ab55405b92beac.camel@cybertec.at>
 <62219f2ce78faf09687d998f347c518b3c08d067.camel@cybertec.at>
 <1120625.1627676423@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <740c8d600cac5b816f8351dbc47b7e457260ed48.camel@cybertec.at>
Comments: In-reply-to Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
	message dated "Wed, 18 Aug 2021 13:06:05 +0200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2204500.1630531557.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 17:25:57 -0400
Message-ID: <2204501.1630531557@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2204501.1630531557%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> writes:
> On Fri, 2021-07-30 at 16:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think it'd work out best to make this a separate para after the
>> one that defines before/after/instead-of triggers.  How do you
>> like the attached?

> That is better, and I like your patch.  Thanks!
> Keeping paragraphs short is a good thing.

Pushed like that, then.

			regards, tom lane