X-Original-To: pgsql-committers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA40CD1D25F for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 07:42:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44241-03 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 03:42:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA83D1D1B2 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 03:42:37 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i297gWvg022054; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:42:32 -0500 (EST) To: Peter Eisentraut Cc: Bruce Momjian , pgsql-committers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml Makefile In-reply-to: <200403090830.56726.peter_e@gmx.net> References: <200403060301.i2631WP00802@candle.pha.pa.us> <200403090830.56726.peter_e@gmx.net> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Tue, 09 Mar 2004 08:30:56 +0100" Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:42:32 -0500 Message-ID: <22053.1078818152@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200403/99 X-Sequence-Number: 12564 Peter Eisentraut writes: > A better approach for that would be to remove HISTORY from CVS and build > it only when the release tarball is made. Given some standardization of the toolchain, that would be the way to go. Right now, though, we seem to have some doubts at both the SGML and lynx levels. Can we clear these up so people know what they will get? regards, tom lane