X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D3FD1B9E5 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 07:44:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41388-07 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 03:44:25 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D36D1BA0A for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 03:44:24 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i297iJBc022081; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:44:19 -0500 (EST) To: Peter Eisentraut Cc: Bruce Momjian , PostgreSQL-documentation Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml Makefile In-reply-to: <200403090832.19859.peter_e@gmx.net> References: <200403082235.i28MZXG19415@candle.pha.pa.us> <17105.1078786012@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200403090832.19859.peter_e@gmx.net> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Tue, 09 Mar 2004 08:32:19 +0100" Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:44:19 -0500 Message-ID: <22080.1078818259@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200403/14 X-Sequence-Number: 2304 Peter Eisentraut writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> So indeed it looks like the discrepancy is in the SGML stylesheet. >> I'm not real sure whether the

interpretation should be preferred >> --- Peter, any comments? > Check the version of your stylesheet. It should be visible in the > headers of the generated HTML somewhere. Is this what you're looking for? Release Notes