Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h3MGZ-0002dK-0C for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:50:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h3MGX-0008Qs-Nr for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:50:57 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h3MGX-0008KX-EH for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:50:57 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h3MGV-0001qx-3R for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:50:56 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x2BEoqfQ022219; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:50:52 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Eisentraut cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, =?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=bcrgen_Purtz?= Subject: Re: First SVG graphic In-reply-to: References: <4393cdcd-4efd-3198-4ffc-c080a5af79c7@2ndquadrant.com> <55a6a8cb-bfaa-e5a6-4596-82f445f1ec7c@2ndquadrant.com> <86af349c-5bcb-a28c-d858-c5cb0a283cd2@purtz.de> <808a932e-bc40-d57e-7de2-5e4fd9a24ac6@purtz.de> <58af275f-a46a-0ec5-8f95-c8ece23ee038@purtz.de> <20190309155411.mn5hqlhjbhhrdb4u@momjian.us> <21705.1552150171@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20190309173907.a6r6ghkokhbh4x3p@momjian.us> <4d48c7b8-750d-c6b4-fdfe-0e3c0d00760d@purtz.de> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:13:47 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <22217.1552315852.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:50:52 -0400 Message-ID: <22218.1552315852@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Peter Eisentraut writes: > I played with this further. My conclusion is that SVG as a source > format is not workable. Aside from the tooling issues that are being > discussed, which might be solvable, I think it's not the right level of > abstraction. It does seem like using SVG as an intermediate format rather than a source format might be a better idea. > (We can have some discussion about whether we want to commit the > intermediate SVG files and what the directory layout should be etc. I > didn't bother with that in my patch yet.) Ideally, we'd treat them much as we do for bison output files: we'll supply them in tarballs but you'd better have the relevant tools if you want to build docs from a git pull. However, that may be assuming too much about the portability of the tools ... regards, tom lane