Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jZbvZ-0001Xz-7k for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 15:07:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jZbvY-0006UM-59 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 15:07:08 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jZbvX-0006Tz-Vn for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 15:07:07 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jZbvT-0005jX-Kt for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 15:07:07 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 04FF6wld022324; Fri, 15 May 2020 11:06:58 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Bruce Momjian cc: PostgreSQL-documentation Subject: Re: Adding xreflable In-reply-to: <20200515142204.GE3894@momjian.us> References: <20200515123923.GB3894@momjian.us> <18482.1589549850@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20200515134900.GD3894@momjian.us> <19807.1589551746@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20200515142204.GE3894@momjian.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Fri, 15 May 2020 10:22:04 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <22322.1589555218.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 11:06:58 -0400 Message-ID: <22323.1589555218@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Bruce Momjian writes: > Well, I would like both the SQL command references and the application > man pages to have xreflabel text. I guess my point is that in the other several thousand pages of the docs, we just use or , and it looks fine and works fine. Why are you insisting on doing it differently in the release notes? (I also have a vague memory that we used to use special xref labels for SQL commands, and got rid of it. So this seems like undoing history with no solid reasoning. That was with the previous doc toolchain of course, but it's still the case that we don't seem to need this.) regards, tom lane