Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lw5Pb-0004i0-V8 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 16:07:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lw5Pa-0006tI-R9 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 16:07:34 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lw5Pa-0006tA-L9 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 16:07:34 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lw5PY-00019n-O3 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 16:07:34 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 15NG7TsX2249323; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:07:29 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: "David G. Johnston" cc: aazamrafeeque0@gmail.com, Pg Docs Subject: Re: Incorrect Syntax in Function Syntax diagram In-reply-to: References: <162444349581.694.5818572718530259025@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <2225085.1624462151@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to "David G. Johnston" message dated "Wed, 23 Jun 2021 08:41:56 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2249321.1624464449.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:07:29 -0400 Message-ID: <2249322.1624464449@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk "David G. Johnston" writes: > Do we have an existing convention in the syntax section to indicate > defaults, either with emphasis, placement, or even an annotation like "*"? No. The syntax diagrams verge on unreadability already, so I'm unconvinced that trying to overload them with this issue would be wise. regards, tom lane