From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
cc: Octopus ZHANG <zhangysh1995@gmail.com>, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Typo in Documentation for Version 12 Section 40.3
In-reply-to: <5CD49133-D232-4055-9A0D-6641AB1634FD@yesql.se>
References: <157855714724.29176.10209182765335106911@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
 <5DF3FAA2-0E69-472A-89A1-8A3002DF61AA@yesql.se>
 <CALV3bJz52pQT6YdKDCUYbdN_=tcRJLKg0bvG0-q2P2nx-UO1Fg@mail.gmail.com>
 <5CD49133-D232-4055-9A0D-6641AB1634FD@yesql.se>
Comments: In-reply-to Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
	message dated "Thu, 09 Jan 2020 10:55:45 +0100"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <22546.1578578274.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 08:57:54 -0500
Message-ID: <22547.1578578274@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>> On 9 Jan 2020, at 10:34, Octopus ZHANG <zhangysh1995@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I partially agree. But with the context, it doesn't assume we want `vie=
w<->visualize`  the data. It also says:
>>> Another use for a materialized view is to allow faster access to data =
brought across from a remote system through a foreign data wrapper. =

>> It is talking about 'the view' not the graph.

> My reading is that it's referring to the usecase for the view, and that =
is to
> use the summarized data in a graph. So I think it's correct.

The first sentence uses "graph" as a verb, while the next one uses
"graph" as a noun.  Both are correct English, but I can understand that
the inconsistency might confuse non-native speakers.  Not sure if it's
worth changing.

			regards, tom lane