Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1epG6p-0002mA-6a for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:22:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1epG6m-0008Vt-M0 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:22:04 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1epG6m-0008Tm-H4 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:22:04 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1epG6d-0005hW-Tr for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:22:03 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w1NGLSYZ002265; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:21:28 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Daniel Westermann cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Images in the official documentation In-reply-to: <1914747379.117313.1519402446241.JavaMail.zimbra@dbi-services.com> References: <1914747379.117313.1519402446241.JavaMail.zimbra@dbi-services.com> Comments: In-reply-to Daniel Westermann message dated "Fri, 23 Feb 2018 17:14:06 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2263.1519402888.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:21:28 -0500 Message-ID: <2264.1519402888@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Daniel Westermann writes: > Is there an agreement not to include that pictures for any reason? This has been discussed repeatedly (see the archives). We'd surely like the ability to include figures, but we've not found any tools that met the varying requirements people wanted to set --- mainly, that it be possible to commit readable source text for figures into our git repo and have updates that were reviewable (ie, didn't amount to a 100% replacement of one set of gibberish with another one). In the distant past, as I recall, we had a GIF or two; but we abandoned that on the grounds that it was unmaintainable and also incompatible with some documentation output formats. I'm not too sure what the state of play is on the latter point, now that we've switched to XML. regards, tom lane