Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fASFfom80552 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:41:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fASFfrk02270; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:41:53 -0500 (EST) To: Bruno Wolff III cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: database permissions (7.3) comment In-reply-to: <20011127111709.A25185@cerberus.csd.uwm.edu> References: <20011127111709.A25185@cerberus.csd.uwm.edu> Comments: In-reply-to Bruno Wolff III message dated "Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:17:09 -0600" Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:41:53 -0500 Message-ID: <2267.1006962113@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200111/100 X-Sequence-Number: 1173 Bruno Wolff III writes: > I was reading the quote below and misunderstood it to be referring to > the initial privileges (i.e. SELECT, INSERT, etc.) granted to the creater of > a table rather than to the ones that only the owner can use (DROP, > ALTER, GRANT, REVOKE, and others?). Okay, I've changed it to try to clarify. regards, tom lane