Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([192.204.191.242])
	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fATKpfm27677
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:51:41 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fATKpNk23514;
	Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:51:23 -0500 (EST)
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Book titles changed? 
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111292013370.609-100000@peter.localdomain> 
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111292013370.609-100000@peter.localdomain>
Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
	message dated "Thu, 29 Nov 2001 21:39:00 +0100"
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:51:22 -0500
Message-ID: <23511.1007067082@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200111/105
X-Sequence-Number: 1178

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> I added the version number (before 7.1, I believe) to alleviate the
> confusion at the time about which docs where the released and which the
> under-development ones.  It has the advantage (at least considered in the
> context of why it was originally added) that the version number appears on
> top of each HTML file.

I approve heartily of the version-number-on-every-page bit, at least for
the HTML representation.

			regards, tom lane