Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([87.238.57.229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) id 1TGYtL-0003WA-02
	for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:25:51 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) id 1TGYtF-0000T9-99
	for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:25:50 +0000
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8PHPh1r023548;
	Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:25:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Hidv=E9gi_G=E1bor?= <gaborca@webvision.hu>
cc: "Denis Lapshin" <deniza956@gmail.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Wrong startup script of PostgreSQL 9.1.2 under OpenBSD 5.1
In-reply-to: <6360AD6B0B8C4EC2AACED9F2758A6199@gab>
References: 
 <CAF=o15UvgtX-2KS8krc694FAdbpaKpcvgLiZ8YQcE==DK=Bw_w@mail.gmail.com>
	<22923.1348592565@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<6360AD6B0B8C4EC2AACED9F2758A6199@gab>
Comments: In-reply-to =?iso-8859-2?Q?Hidv=E9gi_G=E1bor?=
 <gaborca@webvision.hu>
	message dated "Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:07:34 +0200"
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:25:43 -0400
Message-ID: <23547.1348593943@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--)
X-Archive-Number: 201209/24
X-Sequence-Number: 7476

=?iso-8859-2?Q?Hidv=E9gi_G=E1bor?= <gaborca@webvision.hu> writes:
> I have already posted this problem several months ago, there was no change 
> in the documentation since then. It's not about the installation directory 
> or username, under the new OpenBSD's the parameter ordering of 'su' differs 
> from the older versions, the right order is like Denis writes.

Ah, okay (and I confirmed this with a bit of googling).  Will fix,
thanks for the explanation.

			regards, tom lane